So this is the final part to the Q4 series (really this time). The question is to you the reader, do you know what I wrote? Do you know what AI wrote? I am genuinely interested, but realistically I can never know because now I’ve asked you will re-evaluate and possibly change your view, whether…
This is the sixth and not-quite-final piece under Question 4 of this series. The parent piece argued that making AI useful is a conversation, not a prompt. The earlier pieces, 4(a) on configuration, 4(b) on cognitive bandwidth, 4(c) on tool selection, 4(d) on slop, and 4(e) on the failures that survive good practice, dealt mostly…
This is the fifth piece sitting under Question 4 of this series. The parent argues that making AI useful is a conversation, not a prompt. The earlier pieces, 4(a) on configuration, 4(b) on cognitive bandwidth, 4(c) on tool selection, and 4(d) on slop, describe the practices that make AI work and what failure looks like…
Prompt: Constraint: Queens English, no em-dash use at all (use Cambridge English grammar and spelling) Constraint: around 500 words Constraint: this is a presentation to colleagues to demonstrate the technical research capabilities of AI’s such as Grok I have to give a presentation on air friers, detail why air friers are better for health, an overview…
Prompt: Constraint: Queens English, no em-dash use at all (use Cambridge English grammar and spelling) Constraint: around 500 words Constraint: this is a presentation to colleagues to demonstrate the technical research capabilities of AI’s such as Grok I have to give a presentation on air friers, detail why air friers are better for health, an overview…
Prompt: Constraint: Queens English, no em-dash use at all (use Cambridge English grammar and spelling) Constraint: around 500 words Constraint: this is a presentation to colleagues to demonstrate the technical research capabilities of AI’s such as Grok I have to give a presentation on air friers, detail why air friers are better for health, an overview…
Prompt: Constraint: Queens English, no em-dash use at all (use Cambridge English grammar and spelling) Constraint: around 500 words Constraint: this is a presentation to colleagues to demonstrate the technical research capabilities of AI’s such as Grok I have to give a presentation on air friers, detail why air friers are better for health, an overview…
Prompt: I have to give a presentation on air friers, please write me a presentation of around 500 words. Air Fryers: The Kitchen Revolution Good [morning/afternoon], everyone. Today, I want to talk about one of the most popular kitchen appliances of the last decade: the air fryer. Whether you’re a busy parent, a health-conscious cook,…
This is the fourth piece sitting under Question 4 of this series. The parent piece argues that making AI useful is a conversation, not a prompt. The earlier entries in this set (4a on configuration, 4b on cognitive bandwidth, 4c on multi-AI orchestration) describe the practices that make AI work. This one is about what…
This is the third piece sitting under Question 4 of this series. The parent argues that making AI useful is a conversation, not a prompt. The first piece, 4(a), covers configuration. This one is about something most public AI conversation gets wrong: there is no single best AI, and treating the tools as interchangeable leaves…
This is the second piece sitting under Question 4 of this series. The parent argues that making AI useful is a conversation, not a prompt. The earlier piece, 4(a) on configuration, describes how to set up the AI so it knows who you are. This one is about why that setup matters more for some…
This is the first in a set of pieces sitting under Question 4 of this series. The parent piece argues that making AI useful is a conversation, not a prompt. This one is about the bit that has to happen before the conversation can start: telling the AI who you are, what you care about,…